Journal Publication Guidelines
Newredmars Education
Newredmars Education follow to COPE guidelines for the publication of research articles, review papers, meta data analysis and case study.
Every participant must uphold integrity, transparency, confidentiality, originality, ethical approval, respect for copyright, responsible authorship, correction of errors, and accountability. Maintain trust through proper citation, honest data reporting, respect for reviewer privacy, responsible communication, and prevention of unethical publication practices at all times.
2.1 Manuscript Standards
Submit original research with accurate data, clear methodology, verified references, ethical approval, significant contribution from all authors, and zero plagiarism. Manuscripts must not be published elsewhere, must follow journal format, include keywords, citations, graphs, results, discussion, and scientific justification.
2.2 Authorship Declaration
All authors must confirm contribution, originality, conflict of interest disclosure, copyright transfer, ORCID submission, and compliance with ethical publication principles. Misrepresentation of authorship, undisclosed funding sources, or fabricated data violates COPE guidelines and may lead to rejection.
2.3 Responsibilities After Publication
Authors should respond promptly, provide clarification, submit corrections, address inquiries, supply data if required, and support transparency. Post-publication responsibilities include acknowledging errors, cooperating with editors, and upholding ethical standards throughout future communication.
3.1 Editorial Process
Editors ensure objective review, manuscript confidentiality, reviewer selection, ethical compliance, timely communication, and fair handling of publication ethics concerns. Follow COPE guidance for misconduct, avoid discrimination, protect author identity during review, and maintain high academic standards.
3.2 Decision Making
Decisions must rely on scientific quality, research validity, originality, relevance, reviewer feedback, and absence of personal influence or financial pressure. Promote ethical review, justify rejection clearly, encourage revision where possible, and ensure full transparency throughout the editorial decision-making process.
3.3 Post-Publication Responsibilities
Editors must investigate concerns, respond to complaints, correct errors, issue retractions when needed, maintain record integrity, and follow COPE protocols. Ensure scientific accuracy, manage disputes fairly, update authors, track citations, and preserve ethical credibility of the publication process.
8. Publication Ethics for Research & Review Articles
| Ethical Factor | Research Article | Review Article |
|---|---|---|
| Originality | Must introduce new findings with valid research and reliable interpretation to advance scientific knowledge responsibly. | Should evaluate latest studies critically and present unbiased analysis of existing literature. |
| Ethics Approval | Required for human or animal research, with approval certificate and informed consent explained clearly. | Needed only when using patient details, medical records, or identifiable personal data. |
| Data Transparency | Complete raw data, graphs and methodology must be available upon request for verification and replication. | References must be accurate, recent, relevant, and cited ethically without manipulation. |
| Conflict of Interest | Must disclose funding, affiliations, financial influence, or sponsor role for maintaining full transparency. | Same rule applies with additional explanation if source selection may influence conclusions. |
| Plagiarism Limit | Limited to journal policy, checked via software, and strictly monitored following COPE guidelines. | Same requirement, every secondary source must be cited accurately with no copyright violation. |
Similarity must remain within journal limits, checked using approved tools, and reviewed ethically before acceptance. Intentional plagiarism, self-plagiarism, or data manipulation leads to instant rejection or retraction following COPE procedures.
Retraction applies when plagiarism, fabrication, unethical methodology, or undisclosed conflicts are identified during or after publication. Corrections are issued for minor factual errors, misprints, or clarifications to protect academic accuracy and record integrity.
All contributors must disclose financial, institutional, or personal factors influencing research outcome or interpretation. Failure to declare conflicts may lead to suspension, retraction, investigation, or permanent ban from future submissions.
Authors submit copyright transfer after acceptance and retain moral rights to their intellectual work. Open access fees are informed transparently and content use must follow permitted licensing terms and journal policy.
Authors may request an appeal with valid reason, supported by evidence, scientific logic, or additional explanation. Complaints are handled confidentially under COPE protocol and must not influence final editorial independence or decision fairness.
Submission implies full agreement with ethical standards, COPE guidelines, copyright terms, authorship rules, and publication accountability. Misconduct may result in rejection, legal action, correction, retraction, or reporting to institutional or funding authorities.
