Click on the Edit Content button to edit/add the content.
Publish With Us

Review Panel Guideline

Minimum Qualifications and Experience for Editorial Board Member
Educational Qualifications
Ph.D. degree (or equivalent research degree) in the relevant field is required. For medical or clinical journals: MD, MS, DM, MCh, Ph.D., or any equivalently recognized degree. In exceptional cases, a Master’s degree with a strong research background may be considered.
Research Experience
Minimum 5–10 years of postdoctoral, clinical, or academic research experience. Demonstrated expertise in the journal’s subject area
Publication Record
At least 2–5 research papers in indexed and peer-reviewed journals (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, etc.). Experience as a first or corresponding author in reputed journals is preferred.
Peer Review and Editorial Experience
Prior experience as a reviewer for recognized scientific journals. Editorial or guest editorial experience will be an added advantage.
Professional Reputation
Recognized academic, clinician, or researcher with a strong professional track record. Active involvement in professional associations, research networks, or scientific committees.
Ethical Standards
Must uphold the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and impartiality. No history of plagiarism, data manipulation, or scientific misconduct.
Global and Regional Representation
The editorial board should reflect diversity in geography, discipline, and expertise.
Leadership and Academic Contribution
Provide guidance to improve manuscript quality. Support innovation in review processes, journal strategy, and research dissemination.
Guidelines for Editors: Upholding Quality and Integrity in Scholarly Publishing
1. Role of Editors
Editors at NRME Journals are responsible for safeguarding the quality and integrity of academic publishing. They ensure that only original, well-researched and scientifically valid work is approved for publication. Editors must follow the journal’s mission and uphold high academic standards while maintaining independent and unbiased judgment.
2. Manuscript Evaluation
Every submission should be reviewed carefully to verify its relevance to the journal’s scope and its compliance with quality standards. Editors are responsible for selecting suitable peer reviewers with relevant expertise and must ensure fairness, diversity and impartiality during selection.
3. Peer Review Management
Editors should oversee the review process with professionalism and efficiency. They must facilitate timely communication, promote constructive feedback and maintain strict confidentiality. The anonymity of both authors and reviewers must be protected throughout the process.
4. Editorial Decision-Making
Based on the reviewers’ comments and the quality of the manuscript, editors must make informed decisions regarding acceptance, revision or rejection. These decisions should be communicated promptly and clearly to authors, along with guidelines for improvement when necessary.
5. Ethical Responsibilities
Ethical publishing practices must always be upheld. Editors are expected to address issues related to plagiarism, authorship disputes, copyright violations and conflicts of interest. In cases of suspected misconduct, collaboration with authors, reviewers and relevant stakeholders is essential to ensure fair resolution.
6. Editorial Integrity and Inclusivity
Editors must remain independent and impartial, free from undue influence. The editorial board should represent a diverse and inclusive academic community with a broad range of expertise. Decisions must be based solely on the scholarly merit of the manuscript.
7. Decision-Making Factors
Editors should consider multiple aspects when evaluating submissions:

      • Originality of the manuscript

      • Adequacy of revisions and responses to reviewer comments

      • Copyright and ethical compliance

      • Correct classification of article type

      • Scientific validity, research methodology and clarity of data

      • Contribution to societal knowledge and relevance to current issues

Constructive and unbiased feedback should be provided to help authors strengthen their work.
8. Continuous Improvement
Editors are encouraged to seek feedback from authors, reviewers and readers to refine editorial practices. They should stay updated with advancements and best practices in scholarly publishing.
9. Conclusion
NRME Journals is committed to excellence, transparency and ethical academic publishing. Editors are vital to the growth of scholarly dialogue and knowledge dissemination. For queries or editorial collaboration, contact support@newredmars.com.

Minimum Qualifications and Experience for Reviewers
Educational Qualifications
Ph.D. or equivalent research degree in the relevant discipline.
For medical or clinical journals: MD, MS, DM, MCh, Ph.D., or equivalent degree.
In exceptional cases, a Master’s degree with proven research credentials may be considered.
Research Experience
Minimum 3–7 years of academic, clinical, or research experience.
Demonstrated subject expertise relevant to the journal’s scope.
Publication Record
At least 2–3 research articles published in reputed peer-reviewed and indexed journals (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, etc.).
Experience as first or corresponding author is desirable.
Reviewing Experience
Prior experience in peer review for scientific journals is preferred.
Training in peer review ethics or methodology will be an added advantage.
Professional Reputation
Recognized academic, clinician, or researcher with a credible scholarly background.
Active association with research groups, academic societies, or professional networks.
Ethical Standards
Must maintain strict confidentiality and impartiality during the review process.
No record of plagiarism, research misconduct, or ethical violations.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
Objective and Constructive Review
Assess the manuscript’s originality, methodology, ethical standards, and relevance.
Provide clear, constructive, and unbiased comments to improve the research quality.
Suggest acceptance, revision, or rejection based solely on academic merit.
Timely Evaluation
Complete reviews within the stipulated time or promptly inform the editor if more time is needed.
Confidentiality
Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents.
Do not share, distribute, or use unpublished content for personal research.
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
Inform the editor immediately if any conflict of interest arises with the author, institution, or topic.
Ethical Compliance
Ensure manuscripts follow COPE standards and publication ethics.
Report any suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate submission, or unethical research practices.
Contribution to Quality Improvement
Recommend improvements in clarity, structure, methodology, and references.
Identify emerging topics or gaps that may benefit from further research or special issues.
Collaboration and Communication
Maintain respectful communication with the editorial team.

Eligibility Criteria for Research Committee Members
A research committee member must be a senior academic professional with more than 35 years of experience in the field. The individual should hold the position of Professor or an equivalent academic rank and possess a strong academic and research background supported by credible achievements. Additionally, the member must have a thorough understanding of educational policies, research ethics, and academic guidelines at both national and international levels.

Responsibilities of Research Committee Members
Research Committee Members play a vital role in maintaining the academic integrity and quality of the journal. Their key responsibilities include:

Research Quality Assurance

  1. Ensure that submitted manuscripts meet scientific, ethical, and academic standards.

  2. Review the relevance, originality, and contribution of research to the field.

Ethical Compliance

  1. Promote responsible research practices and adherence to COPE and national guidelines.

  2. Identify and report any case of plagiarism, data manipulation, or ethical misconduct.

Policy Development

  1. Contribute to the development and revision of research and editorial policies.

  2. Advise on guidelines related to publications, ethics, authorship, and review procedures.

Review Oversight

  1. Support the peer review process by recommending or approving qualified reviewers.

  2. Ensure fair, unbiased, and timely review of manuscripts.

Guidance and Mentorship

  1. Provide academic support to authors and reviewers when required.

  2. Encourage early-career researchers and promote responsible research culture.

Strategic Contribution

  1. Suggest emerging research areas, special issues, and collaborative initiatives.

  2. Help enhance the journal’s academic visibility, impact, and research excellence.

NRME Guidelines for Journal Members (Editors, Reviewers, and Research Committee)
Newredmars Education (NRME) adheres to international standards for publication practices, including ISSN, ISBN, DOI, and copyright regulations. The following guidelines apply to all members associated with NRME journals.
Responsibility for Published Content
NRME does not assume responsibility for the content published in its journals. Authors, editors, translators, and all contributors are solely responsible for the originality, accuracy, and ethical compliance of their work, including research articles, review papers, metadata submissions, and case studies.
Role of Editors and Reviewers
Editors and reviewers are authorized to conduct the peer review process and make recommendations regarding the publication of manuscripts. All actions must align with the official guidelines of NRME and accepted academic standards.
Non-Compliance With Guidelines
If any editorial, reviewer, or research committee member fails to follow the prescribed guidelines:

  1. First communication: Reminder by email

  2. Second communication: Final reminder by email

  3. Third communication: Suspension of membership or withdrawal of responsibilities

After suspension, the individual may request the removal of their name from the journal or publisher website. NRME will comply and issue confirmation via email.

Eligibility and Membership Terms
Membership qualifications and eligibility criteria may be revised from time to time based on academic development, publication requirements, or organizational needs.
Ethical Conduct
NRME follows academic and research ethics for educational advancement. Any violation of ethical standards, misconduct, or breach of publication ethics by any member may result in immediate action in accordance with NRME policies and international publication norms.
Communication Policy
Responses to member emails sent to support@newredmars.com may take 7 to 10 working days. Delays may occur due to administrative or review processes.
Content Removal Requests
If any third party or member identifies objectionable or non-compliant content on NRME platforms, they must notify the publisher via support@newredmars.com. The issue will be addressed as promptly as possible.
Role of Chief Editor
The Chief Editor serves as the academic leader and mentor of the journal. They must comply with all terms and conditions of the publication house and act in the best interest of journal quality, ethics, and academic progress.

You may also email us directly at support@newredmars.com for inquiries regarding editorial membership and academic activities.

Click here
Scroll to Top